What is needed is a lightning-rod for mass public opinion. There is a massive gap between what the political / media London class think and what the majority of the country think.
The goldfish always thinks the bowl is the universe.
Once a figure appears who represents the majority view then ordinary persons can coalesce around him. Ordinary persons can see the extent of the popularity of their views thanks to social media. They see the disconnect between that level and the narrative of the ‘mainstream’.
May is a liar. The AG humiliated the May creature by stating his advice remained the same. This so-called “Christian” should have exiled her horrible self to Siberia right then.
By allowing a vote to take no-deal ‘off the table’ she has betrayed 17.4 million voters.
She is a federast remainiac like the rest of them. No-deal is default. The political class voted for the Withdrawal Act. It states we leave on 29 March with a deal or not.
These lizards can’t keep up the pretence forever. There must come a time when they actually perform their planned act of treachery. This has now happened. I suspect this is why May allowed the EU lizards to write her such an awful deal.
Who in the EU, government, or the majority of parliament wanted a good one? A good one would deliver Brexit. That was never part of the plan. This is how the EU and political class behave: if they get the wrong answer we either vote again or they ignore the result.
We all know this. May’s plan was to do the latter.
No deal is better than a bad deal?
Brexit means Brexit?
We leave on the 29th March?
Her plan was to prevent Brexit while trying to avoid blame for doing so. She is a disgusting creature who deserves to have her career end in painful humiliation. The contempt shown to the voters is staggering: but nothing must ever be allowed to de-rail the European project.
My only interest is in the possible consequences of betraying the 17.4.
Political violence must sometimes be justified otherwise ‘authority’ can do whatever it likes. I’m sorry to say this is logically obvious.
The history of democracy in this country is based on conflict – not signing soppy petitions.
What amazes me is that there exist humans who – even given the brexit-betrayal from May and our parliament of federasts – continue to believe that ‘protests’ can change things. This is forehead-slappingly naive.
There is no point in ‘telling the truth to power’ when power already knows the truth.
On another blog, a human said this to me recently on the question of MPs:
‘….should public feeling move against them they will be ejected in the next election which happens sufficiently often to keep them somewhat circumspect. That and not people with placards and tannoys is the real check on abuse of power.’
Really? Their replacemnets will always be party place-men and women, obedient to the party-machine which selected them.
This problem in underpinned by the stupidity of the plebmass which votes on moronic, tribal lines, and would vote for a disabled donkey with downs syndrome if it wore the correct coloured rosette.
I agree with his second sentence, however. Posters, placards, protests and petitions do not scare persons in positions of power. Especially not when those humans in power are protected within their little Westminster bubble.
The truth, I’m sorry to say – once the obvious facts about human nature are acknowledged – is a little darker.
They – humans in positions of power, MPs – need to be made to fear for their safety if they contemptuously ignore the will of the largest majority ever given for anything in this country’s history.
If a mob tipped over Anna Soubry’s car, dragged her out and hanged her from a tree, then the rest of the ‘honourable’ members might think twice about treating the electorate with sniffy contempt.